USICH appreciated all of the thoughtful comments and ideas. Please visit www.usich.gov to read Opening Doors: The Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness.

USICH wants to hear the best ideas that its stakeholders have to offer on ending homelessness. Explore each of the forums below and submit your own ideas to ensure that no one should experience homelessness - no one should be without a safe, stable place to call home.(click for site instructions)
Close Window

About USICH/Frequently Asked Questions

This discussion forum, powered by a tool called UserVoice, allows people to come together, share ideas in response to a question, discuss those ideas, and vote the best ones to the top for consideration by the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness. In this case, we are using the tool to get your ideas on the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness. Stakeholders from across the country will weigh in -- make sure your voice is heard!


What is the mission of the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness?

The mission of the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness is "to coordinate the federal response to homelessness and to create a national partnership at every level of government and with the private sector to reduce and end homelessness in the nation while maximizing the effectiveness of the Federal Government in contributing to the end of homelessness."

BACK TO TOP | CLOSE THIS WINDOW

What is the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness?

The President and Congress charged the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness (USICH) via the HEARTH Act to develop and submit the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness to Congress by May 20. The Plan will serve as a roadmap for joint action by Council agencies to guide the development of programs and budget proposals towards a set of measurable targets. The Plan will reflect interagency agreement on a set of priorities and strategies the agencies will pursue over a five year period.

USICH is centering its plan on the belief – the moral foundation – "no one should experience homelessness – no one should be without a safe, stable place to call home." The Council has charged the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness' planning process to align federal resources effectively and appropriately toward four key objectives: 1) finish the job of ending chronic homelessness; 2) prevent and end homelessness among Veterans; 3) prevent and end family homelessness; and 4) set a path to ending all types of homelessness.

BACK TO TOP | CLOSE THIS WINDOW

Were there public meetings to discuss the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness?

The process to create this plan is designed to be transparent and provide multiple opportunities for input, feedback and collaboration. More than 400 people participated in regional stakeholders meetings held in February with several more meetings to take place during the first week of March. They were intended to engage leaders of regional and state interagency councils, as well as stakeholders from throughout the multi-state regions. These meetings have been a great opportunity for USICH to hear directly from external and Federal Government stakeholders regarding challenges, priorities and different perspectives on how to prevent and end homelessness in the United States. The input from these sessions is incredibly valuable and will be incorporated into the development of the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness.

For more information, please see http://www.usich.gov/images_uservoice/FSP_Overview_Summary.pdf

BACK TO TOP | CLOSE THIS WINDOW

What will the outcome be from the stakeholder and electronic input for the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness?

USICH will jointly create -
a set of targeted, solutions-driven goals and collaborative strategies

  • a roadmap for joint action to guide the development of programs and budget proposals toward a set of measurable targets
  • a set of priorities the agencies will pursue over the five year period – FY 2010 through FY 2014
  • BACK TO TOP | CLOSE THIS WINDOW

    How are you expecting people to engage with the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness?

    Each of the six key questions for the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness has its own forum that participants can submit their best ideas to and engage in. Through this UserVoice site, USICH is able to:

    • Engage stakeholders in an open and transparent process to ensure every stakeholder has a voice in the creation of the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
    • Collect innovative input and perspectives on key goals and strategies that have worked in communities across the United States

    BACK TO TOP | CLOSE THIS WINDOW

    What kind of feedback are you looking for?

    The UserVoice application will allow all stakeholders to:

    • Submit ideas related to the six key questions of the Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
    • Rate and comment on the ideas of fellow stakeholders

    BACK TO TOP | CLOSE THIS WINDOW

    How does voting work?

    When you visit the site, you will automatically be sent to the first of the six areas on this site, a discussion of how local communities can contribute to the vision of preventing and ending homelessness? As a new user, you will have 30 votes in each of the six areas to express your support for others' ideas, or for your own. You can give any idea 1, 2, or 3 votes, depending on how strongly you support it. As you allocate votes, you will see the number of votes you have left, which is displayed on the right-hand sidebar, decrease. Votes are not permanent; you can reallocate votes away from one idea and towards another at any time, as many times as you like. To do this, simply click the vote display next to an idea you've voted for, and choose 0, 1, 2, or 3 from the vote selection menu that pops up.

    BACK TO TOP | CLOSE THIS WINDOW

    Why do I only have 30 votes in each forum?

    This site's voting system is based on the idea that, when people have a finite number of votes to "spend", they tend to think more carefully about what they really support and how much they support it. You should use your votes to support the ideas you think are most important, so that the overall best ideas and top priorities emerge!

    BACK TO TOP | CLOSE THIS WINDOW

    How can I add my own idea to what's already here?

    To add an idea, make sure you are in the right forum and simply begin typing the "title" of your idea - a brief (5-10 word) summary of the idea - into the big search box in the middle of the page. As you begin to type, the system will automatically search for similar ideas that have already been created. If something comes up that is similar to what you're suggesting, you may want to simply vote for that idea instead of creating your own. If you determine that your idea is not a duplicate, click the "Create New Idea" button, and elaborate briefly on your idea in the "Description" box that appears. Assign 1, 2 or 3 votes to your idea, as you deem appropriate, and click "Suggest it!" Your idea will be posted immediately, along with your username.

    BACK TO TOP | CLOSE THIS WINDOW

    How can I learn more about an idea?

    In order to save space and make the site usable, the front page of each discussion area only lists the titles of ideas, part of their descriptions, the number of comments they have received, and their overall score. To see more in-depth information, including the actual comment thread as well as a list of who has voted for the idea, simply click on any idea's title.

    BACK TO TOP | CLOSE THIS WINDOW

    What's that orange symbol I see around the site?

    You mean this: That's a link to an RSS feed of all the "action" in a particular area of the site, including ideas and comments, etc. To learn more about what RSS is and how you can use it, check out this helpful video.

    BACK TO TOP | CLOSE THIS WINDOW

    I suggest ...

    We must ensure that the funding can be used for case management.

    Case management is proven to assist individuals and families stay in thier home longer. In order to keep people housed, we must support them with skilled paid staff.

    482 votes
    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      I agree to the terms of service

      You'll receive a confirmation email with a link to create a password (optional).

      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      anonymousanonymous shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      21 comments

      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        I agree to the terms of service

        You'll receive a confirmation email with a link to create a password (optional).

        Signed in as (Sign out)
        Submitting...
        • 6823k6823k commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          As a graduate student myself, I have been doing research on the HUD-VASH program. Other homeless programs have modeled themselves after this program because it has proven to be very effective. And, yes, these vouchers are costly and staff is limited. So, if the concern is over funding, then why hasn't the idea of prioritization been implemented?

        • DcrezbviDcrezbvi commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          During the late 1980s, repartition was repeatedly proposed by assorted individuals and small groups. , <a href="http://kd4.appealtextparliament.com/very-interesting-highly-engaging-text.html">very interesting highly engaging text</a>, [url="http://kd4.appealtextparliament.com/very-interesting-highly-engaging-text.html"]very interesting highly engaging text[/url], http://kd4.appealtextparliament.com/very-interesting-highly-engaging-text.html very interesting highly engaging text, :(,

        • IffwjjrfIffwjjrf commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          The length of a Freshman class match is three rounds of three minutes each, followed by more three minute rounds in the event of a tie. , <a href="http://http://membres.multimania.fr/eresnanty/redtube.com-ashlyn-brookes.html">redtube.com ashlyn brookes</a>, [url="http://http://membres.multimania.fr/eresnanty/redtube.com-ashlyn-brookes.html"]redtube.com ashlyn brookes[/url], http://http://membres.multimania.fr/eresnanty/redtube.com-ashlyn-brookes.html redtube.com ashlyn brookes, 843,

        • New EnglandNew England commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          Trying to navigate affordable housing is difficult to say the least. Case management is essential to assisting consumers in navigating the labyrinth of housing resources available. This case management should be strategic, focused, and short lived. people needing long term assistance to navigate their lives should be referred to mental health providers or other more appropriate providers for long-term care.

        • downingsherridowningsherri commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          Case management is incrediibly important for a relatively small segment of the population of persons who are homeless. While it is critical to ensure that this option is available to those who really need it, it is also critically important to offer a wide range of services that runs the gamut from intensive case management to shallow subsidies. We also need to remain cognizant of the fact that people's needs change over time. Once in housing and stabilized, the need for high-end services often tapers off. We need to be nimble enough to recognize and respond to current need. The goal, always, must be to move people from homelessness to housing, and to keep them there.

        • Laura HansenLaura Hansen commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          I suspect many of those keen on adding more case management are providers. I'm pretty sure our clients would vote for access to shelter for everyone. In our community we don't have enough emergency shelter for even the cream of the crop, much less our chronic homeless people, I think that is a greater priority.

        • phenominaphenomina commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          i agree with phyllis. These case management and supportive services outfits are way overrepresented on this board. Many of their ilk have hoodwinked the feds into overfunding their programs while underfunding the actual creation of adequate numbers of safe decent private housing units. Also the numbers of vouchers should be increased, and allowing homeless/ at risk family members to move in with existing voucher holders should be allowed across the board. These actual housing provisions should take far more precedence in funding, than the "supportive services" baloney. it's only baloney because the organizations taking the funding are diverting it from the actual need and true purpose, of simply getting people housed. #1- is always safety, and you can't be safe without a housing unit. Homelessness is inherently unsafe for a variety of reasons. So get them all housed first, then talk about other sidelines. Indeed, just link people with existing services.

        • Phyllis Ryan JacksonPhyllis Ryan Jackson commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          Has anyone ever heard a homeless person/family ask for case management? Homeless people ask for help with housing; services should be connected at their new address. If services are needed, there are substantial mainstream and community agences whose mandates cover those service needs. Those same agencies need housing partners which might be a much better name for the help homeless folk need.

        • KellenKellen commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          I strongly disagree. In my humble opinion, case management is part of the problem. I work with case managers and social workers all the time and they often act to infantilize clients and enable dysfunctional behaviors. For instance, clients do not pay their electric bill for 9 months and present the case manager with a $950 cut off notice. Does the case manager work with them to find a way to pay it off? Help them negotiate a payment plan with the electric company? No. They pull out their list or resources and find someone to pay it off for them. What does this teach people? Not to pay their bill. Someone else will do it for them. And someone else always does. They come back in 9 months with another overdue bill and the case manager either helps them again or complains that they are irresponsible. I see this constantly and consistently.

          Nor can case management address the really serious problems among the homeless population; domestic violence, substance abuse, nomadic behaviors, mental illness, arrested development and dysfunctional familial patterns. Homeless individuals often come from homeless or very nomadic and dysfunctional families. The pattern is intergenerational. Case management does not address this.

          What is needed is counseling to identify dysfunctional behaivors and to empower people to address their own problems instead of running to a case manager to fix it for them.

        • Linda M. Flores-ToberLinda M. Flores-Tober commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          I wholeheartedly agree. I see HUD restricting the % of funds that can be used for case management. They don't seem to understand that rental assistance, emergency shelter, food etc are all tools in the toolbox of the case manager to first stabilize and then resolve the situation of the homeless or near homeless household. What good is placing a family in a hotel if you don't have the case manager working to get them out and into stable permanent housing? Or why give rental assistance and not provide the case management services that will prevent this from happening again.

        • mstepanskymstepansky commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          Veronica makes a great point. Even if SSA payments are stopped while someone is inpatient, the process should be much simpler/quicker for re-activating those benefits when someone is ready for discharge. Alternatively, or in addition, perhaps SSA could allow several months of payments to be provided before they're stopped so the individual has a "cushion" to access for 1st/last months rent, paying back-rent owed, etc. upon discharge.

        • VeronicaVeronica commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          I have never been homeless because of section 8. From when I was working to now when disabled at 61, I have rejoiced at having Housing. Some of my disabled friends have been homeless because, while they were in the hospital for longer than 30 days, their Social Security Disability payments ended. They were unable to pay rent and thus lost housing. Social Security should not end when hospitalized long term. Prevention is more workable than the alternative. I believe management of the persons affairs is important but first comes the income stability. In-Home supports are much more desirable than nursing home placements.

        • Laura KadwellLaura Kadwell commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          All services -- including case management -- should be at the level people need. They should be funded with mainstream resources (e.g. Medicaid), primarily because they are the glue that makes other services work. .

        • Kay WhiteKay White commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          one-on-one, long-term support with volunteer individuals is a good alternative to costly case management. It would allow those who can to provide for those who cannot and both could benefit. Allowing community social support to function more efficiently with adequate housing for point-of-contact would be the logical starting point.

        • phenominaphenomina commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          case management and other supportive services should be funded through a different department, not housing.

        • phenominaphenomina commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          a small amount of case management is needed, certainly not the huge amounts of dollars being siphoned away from actual housing as we speak! organizations are all over this board, trying to get their funding , for THEM , it has very little to do with the main clients needs.

        • WendyWendy commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          I like voluntary case management - where the value of the services is tied to the value of the relationship, and it is completely driven by the client. Voluntary services may be the most efficient way to address housing stability.

        • Andrea Tromley SkrlacAndrea Tromley Skrlac commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

          Although getting people into housing as quickly as possible is vital, long-term housing stability can only be assured through the availability of personalized case management services.

        ← Previous 1

        Knowledge Base and Helpdesk